6.7 Double Counting (PREFERRED)

The provisions of the NCS chapter apply. 5.7.&#x20

It is possible that the achieved emission reductions are also reported elsewhere. The countries account for the change in the carbon stock in the forest up to a defined maximum in the national climate balance (commitment market Ref. 37, 40). States typically do this without allowing forest owners to share in the equivalent value

Conditions for excluding double counting (partly based on Ref. 69)

1. Direct proof that the risk of double counting is avoided (contribution claim) or deposit with a recognised second certificate or

2. Retirement of a corresponding amount of VER in the national accounting system or

3. A relevant confirmation from the competent authority of the host country regarding double counting, such as Ref. 39 for Switzerland

Regarding 1: Documentation for non-use of VER for compensation (contribution claim) or deposit with a second certificate must be provided no later than at the sale.

Regarding 2: The general exclusion of DC, for example by confirmation from the competent authority of a country, must be available at verification.

Regarding 3: In the context of the retirement of a corresponding amount of VER in the national accounting system, a letter from the competent authority is adequate to indicate the possibility of retirement. Verification whether this has occurred is done no later than the next verification.

The method of preventing double counting is recorded in the project register and is a matter for subsequent verifications (collection of FAR for subsequent verifications).