Methodologies
StandardModulesGovernance
English
  • Impact Improved Forest Management
  • Forest Nature Reserve
English
  • Impact Improved Forest Management (IIFM)
    • Summary
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Sources, Reference Standards and Modules
    • 3. Applicability
    • 4. Safeguarding in terms of Environment and Social Aspects
    • 5. Link to the Nature Climate Standard
    • 6. Quantification of Climate Impact
      • 6.1 Project Boundaries
      • 6.2 Baseline
      • 6.3 Project Scenario
      • 6.4 Quantification
      • 6.5 Durability and Monitoring
      • 6.6 Leakage
      • 6.7 Risk of Reversal
      • 6.8 Double Counting
    • References
  • Feedback on Methodology
Powered by GitBook

© 2024 Nature Value Consortium

On this page
Export as PDF
  1. Impact Improved Forest Management (IIFM)

4. Safeguarding in terms of Environment and Social Aspects

Previous3. ApplicabilityNext5. Link to the Nature Climate Standard

Last updated 6 months ago

Projects must submit a risk assessment that meets the requirements of NCS .

Businesses with an officially approved management plan do not need a risk assessment (including an environmental impact assessment). Certifications according to a recognised standard such as FSC® (Forest Stewardship Council®) or an equivalent procedure (e.g. Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes (PEFC)) are considered evidence of the environmental and social compatibility of the project. If none of the aforementioned conditions are met, compliance with the spatial planning requirements (e.g. forest development plan in Switzerland) must be demonstrated.

3.7